Repudiations
Repuidations of the Doctrine of Discovery by religious organizations and faith communities
Recent posts
The Haudenosaunee Cases: Onondaga Nation v. N.Y. (Argued Oct. 12, 2012, decided October 19, 2012) - Domination Translator Series - Part 13
Onondaga Nation’s lawsuit to recover ancestral lands was dismissed using federal Indian law doctrines based on discovery and domination.
The Haudenosaunee Cases: Onondaga Nation v. N.Y. (Argued Oct. 12, 2012, decided October 19, 2012) - Domination Translator Series - Part 13 Permalink
“The Haudenosaunee Cases: Onondaga Nation v. N.Y. (Argued Oct. 12, 2012, decided October 19,,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belon...
The Haudenosaunee Cases: Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (Aug. 9th 2010) - Domination Translator Series - Part 12
Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (2010) examined equitable defenses used to bar Native land claims spanning centuries.
The Haudenosaunee Cases: Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (Aug. 9th 2010) - Domination Translator Series - Part 12 Permalink
“The Haudenosaunee Cases: Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (Aug. 9th 2010) Domination,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belo...
The Haudenosaunee Cases: Cayuga Indian Nation v. Pataki (2nd Cir. June 28, 2005) - Domination Translator Series - Part 11
Cayuga Nation v. Pataki (2005) explored Haudenosaunee land claims and the suppressed 1922 Everett Report on Native treaty rights.
The Haudenosaunee Cases: Cayuga Indian Nation v. Pataki (2nd Cir. June 28, 2005) - Domination Translator Series - Part 11 Permalink
“The Haudenosaunee Cases: Cayuga Indian Nation v. Pataki (2nd Cir. June 28, 2005) Domination,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belon...
White v. University of California (9th Cir., 2014) - Domination Translator Series - Part 10
UC professors attempted to prevent repatriation of Kumeyaay Nation ancestral remains, invoking tribal sovereignty immunity doctrines.
White v. University of California (9th Cir., 2014) - Domination Translator Series - Part 10 Permalink
“White v. University of California (9th Cir., 2014) Domination Translator Series Part 10,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belongs t...
Tee Hit Ton Indians v. United States (1955) - Domination Translator Series - Part 9
Tee Hit Ton v. U.S. (1955) denied Native peoples compensation for lands taken by the U.S. government under the Doctrine of Discovery.
Tee Hit Ton Indians v. United States (1955) - Domination Translator Series - Part 9 Permalink
“Tee Hit Ton Indians v. United States (1955) Domination Translator Series Part 9,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belongs to the fe...
President “Teddy” Roosevelt’s Monroe Doctrine Corollary - Domination Translator Series - Part 8
Teddy Roosevelt’s 1904 Monroe Doctrine Corollary asserted U.S. imperial dominion over the Western Hemisphere and its indigenous peoples.
President ‘Teddy’ Roosevelt’s Monroe Doctrine Corollary - Domination Translator Series - Part 8 Permalink
“President ‘Teddy’ Roosevelt’s Monroe Doctrine Corollary Domination Translator Series Part 8,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belon...
Martin v. Waddell (1842) - Domination Translator Series - Part 7
Martin v. Waddell (1842) applied the Doctrine of Discovery to oyster beds, asserting European discovery gave absolute property rights.
Martin v. Waddell (1842) - Domination Translator Series - Part 7 Permalink
“Martin v. Waddell (1842) Domination Translator Series Part 7,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belongs to the featured collection a...
The Monroe Doctrine (1823) - Domination Translator Series - Part 6
The Monroe Doctrine (1823) extended U.S. claims of ‘ultimate dominion’ over the Western Hemisphere, following the Doctrine of Discovery.