<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Halverson v. Burgum</dc:title><dc:creator>Adam DJ Brett</dc:creator><dc:subject>law</dc:subject><dc:subject>federal-indian-law</dc:subject><dc:subject>johnson-v-mcintosh</dc:subject><dc:subject>sovereignty</dc:subject><dc:subject>domination-chronicles</dc:subject><dc:subject>blog</dc:subject><dc:subject>link</dc:subject><dc:description>A 2025 Ninth Circuit decision that shows how Johnson v. McIntosh and sovereign immunity remain active in contemporary federal Indian law… Explore historical</dc:description><dc:publisher>Doctrine of Discovery Project</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-11-19</dc:date><dc:type>Text</dc:type><dc:format>text/html</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://dominationchronicles.com/episodes/e002-say-something/</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doctrineofdiscovery.org/blog/link/halverson-v-burgum/</dc:identifier><dc:source>https://doctrineofdiscovery.org/</dc:source><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>