<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Johnson v. M’Intosh and the Missing Cover of the Jigsaw Puzzle</dc:title><dc:creator>Steven T. Newcomb</dc:creator><dc:subject>Canopy</dc:subject><dc:subject>Johnson</dc:subject><dc:subject>law</dc:subject><dc:subject>link</dc:subject><dc:subject>religion</dc:subject><dc:subject>featured</dc:subject><dc:subject>blog</dc:subject><dc:description>Given that this interpretive work involves words and ideas, and not physical puzzle pieces, we as Native scholars face an interesting challenge: How do we take</dc:description><dc:publisher>Doctrine of Discovery Project</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023-04-13</dc:date><dc:type>Text</dc:type><dc:format>text/html</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://outcome.doctrineofdiscovery.org/canopy/essay2/jigsaw-puzzle/</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doctrineofdiscovery.org/blog/canopy-series-jigsaw/</dc:identifier><dc:source>https://doctrineofdiscovery.org/</dc:source><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>