<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Haaland v. Brackeen and the Logic of Discovery</dc:title><dc:creator>Dana Lloyd</dc:creator><dc:subject>link</dc:subject><dc:subject>Canopy</dc:subject><dc:subject>Johnson</dc:subject><dc:subject>featured</dc:subject><dc:subject>blog</dc:subject><dc:description>In this light, I fear that the Brackeen lawsuit is the first in a row of dominoes if the Court strikes down ICWA, everything else could soon go with it.&quot; So</dc:description><dc:publisher>Doctrine of Discovery Project</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023-03-18</dc:date><dc:type>Text</dc:type><dc:format>text/html</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://outcome.doctrineofdiscovery.org/canopy/essay2/halland-v-braken/</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doctrineofdiscovery.org/blog/canopy-series-brackeen/</dc:identifier><dc:source>https://doctrineofdiscovery.org/</dc:source><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>